Signs, signs, everywhere a sign

Among the items the Chapel Hill Town Council will be reviewing at tonight's public hearing is a revision to the LUMO to loosen the regulations on ground signs at commercial developments outside of downtown, including:

  1. Removing the limit on the amount of information that can be displayed on the sign;
  2. Increasing the maximum information display area from 15 to 50-72 square feet;
  3. Increasing the maximum overall signage area from 15 to 216 square feet; and
  4. Increasing the maximum height from 8 feet to 10-12 feet, depending on the speed limit of the adjacent road.

It seems like often when commercial development issues come up, the discussion devolves into a narrow focus on pitting economic development interests with those of the environment, social issues, neighborhood conservation, etc.  But so long as basic safety precautions are met, and signage doesn’t interfere with (and ideally enhances) navigation, it can hardly be argued that sign regulations are much more than exercises in aesthetics.  That’s not to demote their importance - most people probably don't want Chapel Hill to end up looking like, err, other places we may have encountered in North Carolina.  But it raises some interesting questions.  What extent does signage play in the success of a business?  What are we willing to allow, and what goes too far?  Personally, I feel like the proposed changes to the ordinance are a step in the right direction, but what do y'all think?

After tonight's hearing, the issue is slated to return to the Council on March 28th. Here's the link for additional information.

Total votes: 17


What's wrong with the current sign laws?  Reading the above, they sound perfect to me.   

It is time to recognize the fact that signs do draw people into businesses.  If we really do want to support local businesses and small businesses; if we really do want more small businesses to locate in Chapel Hill, then yes, we do have to allow them adequate signage.   The economy is weak, and likely to remain so for some time yet. Let's all of us get behind local business owners.  If we cannot purchase directly from them ourselves, let's make it easier for them to have larger signage and easier for them to get it approved by town boards and departments, so that others may find and shop there. The success of local businesses is vital to our community.  In both our towns. 

maximum signage area allowed if I understand the original post. I saw the one on MLK Blvd the other evening and at least in the dark, it proved very easy to read. I remember viewing it during daylight hours shortly after it first appeared and at that time it was difficult to decipher (but not because of size). But back to the original point, I don't think those particular signs are too large and they look to be more than 8 feet tall. I wonder if they exceed the current ordinance allowances. I think the proposed changes seem reasonable.



Content license

Creative Commons License
All content on OrangePolitics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.


Donate to OP


This Week in Orange Politics

It'll be a busy week across Orange County this week. The Carrboro Alderfolks will discuss bicycle-friendliness and the Lloyd Farm propery mediation process, while the Chapel Hill Town Council will get an update on UNC-related development. Both school boards will review the student performance data recently released by the state, while the Hillsborough Town Board will get an update on the Colonial Inn. The county commmissioners will meet with the Mebane City Council on public transportation and the Buckhorn EDD, and will get an update on Southern Branch Library in a serperate meeting.

CHALT and the Sierra Club/Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce/WCHL will hold candidate forums for Chapel Hill candidates.

Zircon - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
Design by WeebPal.