Sierra Club endorsements

This weekend the Orange/Chatham Group of the NC Sierra Club released their endorsements for Orange County's municipal races. The results are not surprising (nor disagreeable) at least to me.

Hillsborough:
Tom Stevens for Mayor
Eric Hallman for Commissioner
Evelyn Lloyd for Commissioner
Bryant Warren Jr. for Commissioner

Carrboro:
Mark Chilton for Mayor
Joal Broun for Alderman
Dan Coleman for Alderman
Lydia Lavelle for Alderman

Chapel Hill:
Kevin Foy for Mayor
Sally Greene for Town Council
Cam Hill for Town Council
Bill Strom for Town Council
Jim Ward for Town Council

Issues: 

Comments

To be clear, I've supported denser development, reduced parking requirements and other growth strategies.

I haven't supported spending $8.5 million (as of today) and giving $3-8.5M worth of property (depending on what estimate you chose) to a private developer to build million dollar condos to probably house wealthy students and other non-family residents (the putative reason for Lot #5).

Look at Raleigh's Carlton Place. A $1.5M seed loan help kick off that affordable, green development as I pointed out concurrent with the Council committing to Lot #5. 64 of the 80 units - ranging in size from 800 to 1200 sq./ft. - are priced so those making %60 of Wake County's median income. Market rates aren't too shabby: 1 BR/1 BA $700/$550 or less, 1 BR/1 BA (with Den) $750/$570, 2 BR/2 BA $875/$600, 3 BR/2 BA $1,100/$670. That project was $10+ million.

If you believe in "eyes on the street" - then a development incorporating family-friendly size units, affordable commercial and office space, internal public areas for arts or other community activities should've held more appeal.

Dense doesn't have to mean out-of-scale tall. Look at the preliminaries for Carolina North - dense but human-scale. At least at HWA, we won't be damaging the charming village profile of Downtown.

Sure, we could go higher Downtown - I could see 3-4 stories redevelopments along various parts of Franklin St.

Of course, you guys already know this as I've blathered on about it for many years now.

Dense - at any cost - is not a solution. Dense beyond our carrying capacity is not a solution.

Tall at University Mall, Eastgate, Rams Plaza, even Conner Dr. - fine. Tall Downtown is bound to diminish its charm.

Beyond diminishing what we have, what about the corrosive effect rampant tall/dense development will have on Northside and other neighborhoods? It'll be interesting to see how long certain businesses can hold on Downtown. Lose a beauty supply company, gain an upscale restaurant - good trade-off?

The NC Sierra Club chapter has approximately 19,000 members and the national club has approximately 1.3 million "members and supporters." NC contributes the current national president, Robbie Cox (from Chapel Hill), and a current Board member and past president, Lisa Renstrom. We have contributed other national leaders in the past as well. I don't know the Orange or Chapel Hill counts but Joe's Orange-Chatham Group number looks about right to me.

It's been a long time so it may well have changed, but I was once on the political committee--a volunteer opportunity open to any member--and at the time there were no written criteria. Members of the committee discussed the answers given and the records of those with a record and determined who to recommend to the Group Executive Committee who, in turn, recommends to the Chapter. The discussions ranged over a wide set of criteria and included things like commitment to the environmental agenda promoted by the Group (local), the Chapter (state) and the Club, creativity, collaboration, effectiveness, etc. Incumbents do have an advantage (or, for some, a disadvantage) in that they have had an opportunity to demonstrate many of these characteristics.

So, like you when you go into the voting booth, it is (or, rather, was) a combination of objective information and subjective judgment. Unlike an individual, the Group has a shared vision and a consensus-building process.

Join the Club and volunteer to be an activist, then you'll know how the decisions are made.

Just to be clear, when I said:

Not sure how many people this represents.

I was referring to the number of people on the local Sierra Club political and executive committees who met and voted on the endorsements.

The Club declined to provide me a copy of the Carrboro forum. If a candidate in the Carrboro forum will request a copy from Loren, I'll be happy to see that it is posted on the 'net.

Overall, I have been surprised and impressed this election season with the quality of debate on both of the main political forums in Orange County. The threads have, for the most part, been substantive, and have, quite interestingly, often offered lucid arguments that have reflected each other engagingly on many of the same issues.

That's why I decided to make a little offering here. Oh that, and the fact that STP is currently under attack froma blog-swamper - and Ruby, I've read elsewhere (I think maybe Blue NC) your views on those sorts of trolls!

I believe it's not unfair to suggest that I try, with my occasional contributions, to keep people honest and consistent. Yeah, I know. Not everyone likes it - and people in both camps (STP ansd OP) think I favor the other. Probably means I'm getting the balance about right.

Anyways, endorsements. Which I'm on record as disliking, because they are, in my opinion, simply another form of special interest. So, Ruby, with respect, do I detect a little inconsistency...?

It seems that one moment you are saying: don't look at what they say; look at what they do. and the next you seem to be saying: well, don't actually look at what they do; look at what they might do...

Hmm?

In any event, having been an incumbent in my time also, remember that incumbents are always going to have a 'better' record of 'doing.' They're in government. They can push the buttons and pull the levers. Just turning up is 'doing.'

The measure has to be higher for incumbents. It's not so much the quantity of what they have done, as the quality. The consistency. The meeting of election pledges. It's as much about what they haven't done, what they might have ignored, as it is about racking up points for simply being in office.

In contrast, I'm sorry, I disagree: you so have to look at what challengers are saying. It may be all that they are able to offer - in total good faith.

The speech that Neloa Jones made in respect of Rogers Road was met with universal acclaim by all activists across Orange County. Do we discount what she said simply because it is not yet matched by achievement? She may not be running for office (this time), but I think the point is still good.

Which is not to say that what challengers are saying should not itself be challenged passionately, to ensure that what is being said is internally consistent and genuinely believed. I hope, in some small way, that's something I've been helping to do. From time to time. And will, maybe, one day, do again...

How many Sierra Club members actually live in Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Orange Cty? I asked this question last time around and never got an answer. My guess is that it's a much smaller base than folks would guess...

Geoff, I hardly think it's "inconsistent" for me to support the same candidates I did 4 years ago - with the addition of Jim Ward who has been impressing me, especially in the last 4 years, as I have noted here several times. (Just like it would be inconsistent for you not support Katrina's slate again.)

I don't get at all what this has to do with my friend Neloa, of whose leadership I am a strong supporter and cheerleader. None of our municipal elected officials are responsible for the landfill siting, and many of them (not all, of course) have worked for years to attain justice for the Rogers Road neighborhood. Mayor Chilton wrote a good primer if you're not familiar with the history of this issue: http://markchilton.org/09/19/who-was-looking-out-for-rogers-road-and-whe...

I have "consistently" supported the right of Rogers Road to live trash-free for about 15 years now. No change there.

I am getting kind of tired of folks arguing that I only ever support incumbents just because I happen to like the ones who are up for re-election this year. A simple review of the facts shows that it's totally inaccurate, and it seems like a red herring to me. Maybe I just don't like the same candidates as you do. Can you live with that? Does there have to be a conspiracy to explain it?

And now, I am going to a wedding and will be trying to forget all of you exist for a few days. Try and behave yourselves. ;-)

Pages

 

Community Guidelines

By using this site, you agree to our community guidelines. Inappropriate or disruptive behavior will result in moderation or eviction.

 

Content license

By contributing to OrangePolitics, you agree to license your contributions under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.

Creative Commons License

 
Zircon - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
Design by WeebPal.